perunero.blogg.se

• JULIA IOFF STILL EMPLOYED AFTER TERRIBLE TWEET FREE

In other words, it’s not that Amazon is getting preferential treatment, per se, so much as it has found and exploited a loophole in the system.

JULIA IOFF STILL EMPLOYED AFTER TERRIBLE TWEET FREE

First-class mail effectively subsidizes the national network, and the packages get a free ride. A decade later, around 25% of its revenue comes from packages, but their share of fixed costs has not kept pace. In 2007 the Postal Service and its regulator determined that, at a minimum, 5.5% of the agency’s fixed costs must be allocated to packages and similar products. Citing a Citigroup analysis, Josh Sandbulte wrote in The Wall Street Journallast year that every Amazon package is shipped for $1.46 below market rate. But the idea that Amazon is getting a subsidy is not original to Trump. Postal Service of being Amazon’s delivery boy is kind of funny, since delivering things is the business of the post office. (The latest frontier is taxation of third-party merchants who sell goods through Amazon.)Īccusing the U.S.

It has also supported a federal law to standardize state-tax collection on online retailers, arguing a consistent system would allow for easier conduct of business. But the company lost that fight, and now pays taxes in every state with a statewide sales tax. On taxes, Amazon has historically paid little state-and-local tax, and lobbied against being forced to pay it. The idea that Amazon poses a challenge to smaller retailers is generally accepted. The only “party of parents” will be the one that delivers the policies to prove it.The Strange Origins of American Birthday Celebrations Joe Pinsker We’ve heard enough cutesy slogans and empty promises. Parents have been consistently devalued by government systems. The opposition to such measures traditionally comes from-you guessed it-the very Republican lawmakers now engaged in a performative state of concern. If the GOP cared about the health and well-being of schoolchildren, it would stop advocating against masks and vaccines and for gun reform. They’d quit hacking away at women’s reproductive rights and allow people to determine when and if to become parents at all. If Republicans really wanted to be the party of parents, they’d support the policies that benefit parents and their children, like paid family leave (in the latest congressional fight, one Republican lawmaker likened it to “government dependency”) affordable child care and the child tax credit that provides much needed relief to working families still struggling through the pandemic. The “freedom” to not wear masks or be vaccinated doesn’t help parents: It comes at the expense of public health. The Republican Study Committee went on to advocate for ending mask mandates and vaccine mandates-measures that masquerade as being about parents but are really focused on the broader (and often warped) notion of “American freedoms,” as House Leader Kevin McCarthy phrased it in a post–Election Day memo of his own.

In his victory speech, Youngkin declared he was “going to embrace our parents, not ignore them” and “press forward with a curriculum that includes listening to parents’ input.” (In a debate, in relation to school curriculum decisions, McAuliffe had stated he “did not think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”) Youngkin seized upon this statement, repeated it ad nauseam and out of context, and appeared to tap into the anger and frustration of parents in a state where public schools were largely closed throughout the 2020–21 school year, stoking ire against teachers unions and COVID restrictions. It began bubbling with Republican businessman Glenn Youngkin’s win over Democratic stalwart Terry McAuliffe in the much-watched Virginia governor’s race. Still, the GOP’s latest trick is especially hollow: attempting to rebrand itself as the “party of parents.” There’s gerrymandering, voter obstruction, baselessly questioning the 2020 presidential election result to the point of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, aligning itself with Donald Trump in the first place-the list goes on. The modern Republican Party is no stranger to sinister moves.